TUFLOW Version Backward Compatibility: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Created page with " {|class="wikitable" |- |rowspan=1| 2013-12-XX Builds |- | rowspan=3|2013-12-AA Builds |- | New default settings – see <font color="blue"><u>Defaults == PRE 2013-12</u>..."
 
No edit summary
Line 3:
{|class="wikitable"
|-
|rowspan=1| '''2013-12-XX Builds'''
|-
 
| rowspan=3|2013-12-AA Builds
|-
| New default settings – see <font color="blue"><u>Defaults == PRE 2013-12</u></font> for a list of the commands that have changed in their default setting.
Line 13:
|-
 
| rowspan=3|2013-12-AC Builds
|-
| The default setting for <font color="blue"><u>Link 2D2D Approach</u></font> has changed.
Line 20:
 
|-
|rowspan=1| '''2011-09-XX and 2012-05-XX Builds'''
|-
 
Line 28:
|-
| Set <font color="blue"><u>Defaults == PRE 2012-05</u></font> if similar results are required to the 2011-09 or 2010-10 releases.
|-
 
| rowspan=3| 2012-05-AA
|-
Line 34 ⟶ 35:
|-
| Set <font color="blue"><u>Manhole Approach == Method A</u></font> to achieve the same results as Build 2011-09-AA.
|-
 
| rowspan=3| 2011-09-AA
Line 40 ⟶ 42:
|-
| No workaround.
|-
 
|-
 
|rowspan=1| '''2010-10-XX Builds'''
|-
| rowspan=3| 2010-10-AA
|-
| New Intel Fortran Compiler version produces slightly different results (usually fractions of a mm).
|-
| No workaround.
|-
 
| rowspan=3| 2010-10-AA
|-
| w32 and w64 versions will give slightly different results for the same simulation.
|-
| No workaround. Use the same platform (w32 or w64) for all simulations. Use <font color="blue"><u>Model Platform</u></font> to force which platform should be used.
|-
 
| rowspan=3| 2010-10-AA
|-
| New default settings – see <font color="blue"><u>Defaults == PRE 2010-10</u></font> for a list of the commands that have changed in their default setting.
|-
| Set Defaults == PRE 2010-10 if similar results are required to the 2008-08 or 2009 07 releases.
|-
 
| rowspan=3| 2010-10-AA
|-
| Generation of TINs for polygons in Read GIS Shape layers is more robust and uses an improved approach. In rare cases, the TIN would fail and TUFLOW would abort the start-up.
|-
| No workaround.
|
|-
 
|