Revision as of 08:05, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,789 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:09, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,789 edits →Independent Benchmark Testing Newer edit →
Line 57: = Independent Benchmark Testing = ~~== United Kingdom Environment Agency ==~~ The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br> *<font color="blue">[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]</font> Wood Rodgers compared TUFLOW results against recorded flume data and standard engineering equations. The assessment results were presented at the 2015 Floodplain Management Association Conference in Rancho Mirage, California. The TUFLOW results are summarized in the following link: ~~== Consultant Benchmarking ==~~ [[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 FMA Conference 2015: Wood Rodgers]] == Real World Calibration/Validation ==

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions