TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 56:
<br>
=
The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br>
*<font color="blue">[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]</font>
Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop
* [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2012/2012%20Aust%20Workshops%20-%20TUFLOW%20Modelling%20Bends,%20Structures%20and%20Obstructions.pdf 1D and 2D Modelling of Bends, Structures and Obstructions]
Wood Rodgers compared TUFLOW results against recorded flume data and standard engineering equations. The assessment results were presented at the 2015 Floodplain Management Association Conference in Rancho Mirage, California. The TUFLOW results are summarized in the following link:
*[[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 | FMA Conference 2015: Wood Rodgers]]
= Real World Calibration/Validation =
| |||