Revision as of 08:50, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,776 edits →Other Benchmark Testing ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:51, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,776 edits →Other Benchmark Testing Newer edit →
Line 58: = Other Benchmark Testing = The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br> ~~<font color="blue">~~[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]<~~/font~~br><br> Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop and 2011 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/2012/2012%20Aust%20Workshops%20-%20TUFLOW%20Modelling%20Bends,%20Structures%20and%20Obstructions.pdf 1D and 2D Modelling of Bends, Structures and Obstructions (TUFLOW Workshop,2011)] * [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM, 2011)]<br><br> Wood Rodgers compared TUFLOW results against recorded flume data and standard engineering equations. The assessment results were presented at the 2015 Floodplain Management Association Conference in Rancho Mirage, California. The TUFLOW results are summarized in the following link: *[[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 \| FMA Conference 2015: Wood Rodgers]]<br><br> = Real World Calibration/Validation =

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions