Revision as of 09:23, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,785 edits →Syme (1991) ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:42, 23 September 2015 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,785 edits →Other Benchmark Studies Newer edit →
Line 54: = Other Benchmark Studies = Wood Rodgers compared TUFLOW results against recorded flume data and standard engineering equations. The assessment results were presented at the 2015 Floodplain Management Association Conference in Rancho Mirage, California. The TUFLOW results are summarized in the following link:▼ The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br>▼ [[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 \| Wood Rodgers Model Benchmark Testing (FMA Conference, 2015)]]<br><br>▼ [https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]<br><br>▼ Bill Syme presented model validation/benchmark results for bends, structures and obstructions at the 2011 Australian TUFLOW Workshop and 2011 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference Line 61: * [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]<br><br> ▲The United Kingdom Environment Agency have documented independent testing of most 2D modeling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software: <br> ▲Wood Rodgers compared TUFLOW results against recorded flume data and standard engineering equations. The assessment results were presented at the 2015 Floodplain Management Association Conference in Rancho Mirage, California. The TUFLOW results are summarized in the following link: ▲[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 2010)]<br><br> ▲[[Wood_Rodgers_FMA2015 \| Wood Rodgers Model Benchmark Testing (FMA Conference, 2015)]]<br><br> Bill Syme presented model validation results for case study in the Eudlo Creek Catchment, Australia at the 2006 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference. TUFLOW was benchmarked against a physical scale mode and FESWMS model of the catchment. * [http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Publications/2006.05%20-%20Bruce%20Highway%20Eudlo%20Ck%20Hydraulic%20Investigations%20-%20A%20Turning%20Point.Syme.ASFPM%202006.pdf Bruce Highway Eudlo Creek Hydraulic Investigations — A Turning Point] <br><br> Additional TUFLOW benchmark articles are available from the "Library" section of the TUFLOW website: http://www.tuflow.com/Library.aspx = Real World Calibration/Validation =

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions