Tuflow

TUFLOW Benchmarking: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
Line 72:
*[http://www.tuflow.com/Download/Presentations/Modelling%20Structures.Syme.ASFPM%20SMS%20Workshop%20USA%202011.pdf Modelling Structures (ASFPM Conference, 2011)]</li>
 
<li>The United Kingdom Environment Agency in the United Kingdom have documented independent testing of most 2D modelingmodelling packages. This is a good resource for comparing TUFLOW to other available software. Testing was undertaken in both 2010 and 2013. All three TUFLOW engines were submitted for the latter testing: <br>
*[httpshttp://wwwevidence.environment-agency.gov.uk/governmentFCERM/uploadsLibraries/systemFCERM_Project_Documents/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-eSC120002_Benchmarking_2D_hydraulic_models_Report.sflb.pdfashx Benchmarking the Latest Generation of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (United Kingdom Environment Agency, 20102013)]</li>
*[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/290884/scho0510bsno-e-e.pdf Benchmarking of 2D Hydraulic Modelling Packages (Environment Agency, 2010)]</li>
 
<li>Bill Syme presented model validation results for a case study in the Eudlo Creek Catchment, Australia at the 2006 Association of State Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) Conference. TUFLOW was benchmarked against a physical model and FESWMS.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.tuflow.com/TUFLOW_Benchmarking"