Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 2169"

From Tuflow
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
|type=[[WARNING]]
 
|type=[[WARNING]]
 
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.  The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br>
 
|message_desc=THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.  The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.<br>
 
par??? <u>Insert diagram or diagrams here</u>
 
 
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.
 
|suggestions=Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.
 
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]]
 
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 2169|Discuss Message 2169]]

Revision as of 09:08, 4 July 2022

TUFLOW Message
WARNING 2169 - THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored.

Alternate Message
NA

Message Type
WARNING

Description
THICK option not available with MIN or GULLY approach - ignored. The gully line approach lowers a continous flowpath in the direction of the line. The THICK line modifies all zpts in selected cells (as selected by "cross-hairs" approach), however if diagonal cells are selected this may not lower a continuous flow path.

Suggestions
Use THICK or GULLY approach but not both.


Up
Go-up.png 2xxx Messages