Difference between revisions of "TUFLOW Message 3525"

From Tuflow
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|suggestions=Consider whether double precision is needed in the project or allow for longer initialisation time.
 
|suggestions=Consider whether double precision is needed in the project or allow for longer initialisation time.
  
|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3525|Discuss Message 3525]]
 
|link3=''
 
|link4=''
 
|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3522|Message 3522]]
 
 
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]]
 
|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages|3xxx Messages]]
|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3526|Message 3526]]
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:28, 3 March 2023

TUFLOW Message
WARNING 3525: Potentially SLOW SGS processing of grid using the double precision version of TUFLOW.

Alternate Message
N/A

Message Type
WARNING

Description
Due to an Intel Compiler issue this grid inspection has to be done with un-optimised code and will be slow. Note HPC solver does not generally require double precision engine. If XF files are enabled (default), subsequent initialisations will be much faster.

Suggestions
Consider whether double precision is needed in the project or allow for longer initialisation time.


Up
Go-up.png 3xxx Messages