Green-Ampt Infiltration Parameters: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 102:
<br>
[[File:Fig5 suctionhead.png|600px|Figure 5: Sensitivity of simulated flow at the Cefn-Brwn gauge
'''Figure 5: Sensitivity of simulated flow at the Cefn-Brwn gauge
<br>
''add comment on rising lim''<br>
Line 113:
<br>
[[File:Fig6 hydroconduct.png|600px|Figure 6: Sensitivity of simulated flow at
'''Figure 6: Sensitivity of simulated flow at
<br>
Line 128:
<br>
[[File:Fig7 porosity sens.png|600px|Figure 8: Sensitivity of simulated flow at
'''Figure 8: Sensitivity of simulated flow at
<br>
Line 140:
The model was also run with the default in-build USDA soil types. Figure 10 shows the outputs. As expected the higher the soil type, then typically the more the infiltration and the lower the produced runoff. Soils 8-11, which represent sandy soils do not show any runoff in this example as the rainfall is all infiltrated.<br>
<br>
[[File:Fig10 GA soils.png|600px|Figure 10: Sensitivity of simulated flow at the Cefn-Brwn gauge
'''Figure 10: Sensitivity of simulated flow at the Cefn-Brwn gauge locations in the Plynlimon Gwy catchment to the USDA soil type parameter in the Green-Ampt infiltration model.'''
<br>
| |||