Tute M06 Arc 2D lfsch Archive: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Created page with " In the following steps we will be adjusting the elevations of the road crest as well as using a 2D zsh layer to lower the zpt elevations at the location of the 2D bridge.<br>..." |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
===Lower the 2D Elevations Through the Bridge Opening===
<ol><li>Copy the '''2d_zsh_M06_NorthRd_001_R''' from '''Module_Data\Module_06\2D_Bridge''' folder into the '''TUFLOW\model\gis''' folder. We will use this layer to remove the road embankment at the 2D Bridge location.</li>
<li>Open the newly saved layer '''2d_zsh_M06_NorthRd_001_R''' in ArcMap. Observe the single polygon contained in this shapefile. The polygon intersects the model zpts where we want to modify the elevations and remove the road embankment. We will remove the embankment by creating a GIS layer of point features that instruct TUFLOW to interpolate zpt elevations within the two shapes using the zpt elevations either side of the embankment. Additionally, the GIS layer will be designed such that TUFLOW does not use the zpt elevations intersecting the road embankment. Refer to
<li>From the '''model\gis\empty\''' folder, copy the '''2d_zsh_empty_P''' shapefile into the '''model\gis\''' folder, renamed as '''2d_zsh_M06_NorthRd_001_P'''. Add this shapefile to ArcMap and start editing.</li>
<li>With snap mode turned on (located in the Snapping toolbar), create four points snapped to each of the polygon nodes that are highlighted in the image below. Make the perimeter nodes of polygons visible by pressing the ''V'' key whilst editing.</li><br>
Line 40:
|}
</li>
Save your edits. The attributes are described
* Enter an "Invert" value of 99999 to leave the Zpt levels unchanged (ie. use the Zpt elevations modified by the 2d_zsh layer above).
* Percentage blockage below the obvert to account for any blockages perpendicular to the direction of flow (in this case 6% to account for the average blockage due to the bridge piers).
* A Form Loss Coefficient (FLC) below the obvert (in this case to account for sub-grid scale losses around piers). Note that the treatment of the FLC is different depending on the object used to define the flow constriction, i.e. a line or a polygon. The reason for this is to permit the flow constriction to be independent of the model cell size. See
* Blockage from the obvert level to the top of level 2 (in this case 100% to account for the bridge deck).
| |||