FMA Challenge 2: Difference between revisions

*General 2D modelling - <u>[[Tutorial Module01Tutorial_M01|Tutorial Module 1]] </u>

*2D topography modification - <u>[[Tutorial Module03Tutorial_M02|Tutorial Module 32]]</u><br><br>

Generally Manning’s n values are very similar for 1D and 2D schemes. Where there is rapid changes in flow direction and magnitude (ege.g. at a structure, sharp bend or embankment opening), fully 2D schemes will simulate energy losses associated with the change in flow patterns, whereas 1D schemes either require user specified energy losses (ege.g. a structure) or artificially increasing Manning’s n. In these situations 1D schemes may utilize higher Manning’s n values than 2D schemes. Conversely, 2D schemes typically apply no side wall friction, so if there is significant wall friction a 2D scheme may require a slightly lower Manning’s n than a 1D scheme.

<li>The modeller should NOT adopt unrealistic parameter values (ege.g. excessively low or high Manning’s n values) for the sole purpose of achieving a good calibration. It is invariably the fact that there are other uncertainties causing the discrepancy when unrealistic Manning’s n values are used. Unrealistic Manning’s n values or other parameters (ege.g. high eddy viscosity) distort the results and are a sure sign that there is something else wrong.