TUFLOW Message 3519: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 11:05, 4 July 2022 view source Melissa.Moghanloo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 2,918 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 10:58, 4 February 2025 view source Abigail.lillo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 539 edits No edit summary
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: {{TUFLOW_Message \|tuflow_message=CHECK 3519: - Using MIN or GULLY option in SGS model. \|alt_msg=NA \|type=[[CHECK]] Line 6: cell side Zpt values, and creates sloping cells using the ZC, ZU, ZV and ZH values. It does insure a continuous flow path, but the spatial accuracy may become lower comparing to the approach of sampling elevation directly from DEM. For more discussion, please see <u>[[Quadtree_and_Sub-Grid_Sampling_FAQ#Why_shouldn.27t_I_use_Z_Shape_gully.2Fmin_lines_with_SGS_models.3F\|SGS FAQ page]]</u>. \|suggestions=Check if "SGS Sample Distance" and resolution of the DEM is fine enough to capture the gully line. If so, the topography modification MIN or GULLY option can be removed. ~~\|discussion_page=* [[Talk:TUFLOW Message 3519\|Discuss Message 3519]]~~ ~~\|link3=''~~ ~~\|link4=''~~ ~~\|prelink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3517\|Message 3517]]~~ \|uplink=[[3xxx_TUFLOW_Messages\|3xxx Messages]] ~~\|nextlink=[[TUFLOW_Message_3520\|Message 3520]]~~ }}