TUFLOW CATCH Tutorial M02 Results QGIS: Difference between revisions

== Introduction ==

Refer to <u>[[TUFLOW_CATCH_Tutorial_M01_Results_QGIS | TUFLOW CATCH Tutorial 01]]</u> for information on mass balance and boundary condition timeseries outputs.

 

<li> In Windows File Explorer, navigate to the '''TUFLOWCATCH\results''' folder and open '''TC02_001_catchment_hydraulic_intervention_summary.csv'''.

<li> This file contains final cumulative flows, masses entering and masses removed for all intervention devices and pollutants.<br>

<br>

<br>

<li> Notice that bufferStrip1 has no pathogen masses entering or being removed, as it has no paddocks near it.

<li> If the removed mass is divided by the cumulative mass, the resulting value represents either the removal constant (if a constant removal equation was used), or the average removal performance (if a table removal method was used). For example, in trench1, the removal performance for SED_CLAY is calculated by:

This shows that bufferStrip1 removed significantly more clay than trench1. The graph below demonstrates this calculation for each pollutant across all the treatment devices: <br>

<br>

<br>

</ol>

 

==TUFLOW HPC Map Outputs ==

Review the TUFLOW HPC Map outputs with the <u>[[TUFLOW_Viewer | TUFLOW Viewer]]</u>:

<ol>

<li>Open TUFLOW Viewer from the TUFLOW Plugin toolbar.<br>

<br>

<li>Use the time slider to view the pathogen concentration results. Notice how the E. coli is removed by the treatment devices. In areas where there are no interventions, the pollutant concentrations are much higher (i.e. the eastern waterhole).<br>

<br>

<li>Select 'Conc SED_CLAY' from the Result Type list. Adjust the symbology as needed.

<br>

<li>Using the same process as above, observe the mass removal occurring at the other intervention devices. <br>

<br>

</ol>