Revision as of 11:48, 2 September 2020 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,365 edits →Why should I create more Z Shape ridge/max lines with SGS models? ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:48, 2 September 2020 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,365 edits →Why should I create more Z Shape ridge/max lines with SGS models? Newer edit →
Line 21: =Why should I create more Z Shape ridge/max lines with SGS models?= It is possible that without correct breaklines, SGS model allows a leak over a levee or embankment that model with smaller cell size does not. The more 2d_zsh max/ridges are used the better. A rough estimate of SGS testing has required twice the number of ridge lines compared to a traditional model. This also includes locations where there were no ridges previously. <u>[[https://wiki.tuflow.com/index.php?title=ASC_to_ASC#Extract_Breaklines_from_DEM \| Breakline feature]]</u> in asc_to_asc utility might be useful for creating additional breaklines.

Quadtree and Sub-Grid Sampling FAQ: Difference between revisions