TUFLOW General Discussion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 7:
* All of the above can be configured with "operation controls".
 
[https://www.tuflow.com/products/tuflow/ TUFLOW’s 2D fixedFixed gridGrid enginesEngines] are dynamically linked to TUFLOW 1D. There are two 2D grid computational solver options, namely TUFLOW Classic and TUFLOW HPC. TUFLOW Classic development began in 1989. It uses a finite difference implicit solution, and is the recommended tool for single core CPU compute. TUFLOW HPC development began in 2010. It uses a finite volume explicit solution. TUFLOW HPC is the recommended tool for GPU compute hardware, where code parallelisation across 1000's of GPU CUDA cores can achieve simulation speed increases of uptoup to 100 times compared to a single CPU. PleaseFunctionally refermodel toinput theand FAQoutputs sectionfrom belowTUFLOW forClassic aand moreTUFLOW extensiveHPC discriptionuse ofidentical theformats. differentceBoth betweensolvers theare differentindustry 2Dleader SWEfor computationalflood, catchment, integrated urban drainage and stormwater modelling applications
 
 
 
 
The fundamental differences between both computational methods are described in the FAQ section below
 
development began in 1989 with the creation of TUFLOW Classic. TUFLOW Classic was
TUFLOW Software includes two grid computational solver options, namely TUFLOW Classic and TUFLOW HPC. TUFLOW Classic uses a finite difference implicit solution. TUFLOW HPC uses a finite volume explicit solution. The fundamental differences between both computational methods are described in the FAQ section below. Functionally, model input and outputs from TUFLOW Classic and TUFLOW HPC use identical formats.
 
=Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)=