TUFLOW Version Backward Compatibility: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 218:
| Minor influence.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Bridge Flow </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Negligible influence plus improved stability. However, note the different treatment of energy losses once the bridge deck obvert/soffit is submerged if a BG or LC table is specified.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>WLL Approach </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Only affects the presentation of results. Note, that Method A is no longer recommended or supported.
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Apply All Inverts </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==
Does not affect hydraulic calculations, however, if a Blank, B or W channel is now lowered/raised because the inverts are now used, this will affect results/stability - see note at end of Apply All Inverts).
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Conveyance Calculation </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> ALL PARALLEL</
| Will affect results as ALL PARALLEL can be around 10% more “slippery” than CHANGE IN RESISTANCE. For calibrated or established models developed using build prior to Build 2006-06-AA , recommend setting to CHANGE IN RESISTANCE
|-
| <font color="blue"><tt>Flow Calculation </tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>== </tt></font><tt> Method B</
| Negligible effect.
| |||