Tute M06 MI 2D lfsch Archive: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Created page with " In the following steps we will be adjusting the elevations of the road crest as well as using a 2D zsh layer to lower the zpt elevations at the location of the 2D bridge.<br>..."
 
No edit summary
Line 5:
<ol><li>Copy the '''2d_zsh_M06_NorthRd_001''' from '''Module_Data\Module_06\2D_Bridge''' folder into the '''TUFLOW\model\mi''' folder. We will use this layer to remove the road embankment at the 2D Bridge location.</li>
<li>Open the newly saved layer '''2d_zsh_M06_NorthRd_001''' in MapInfo and make it editable.</li>
Observe the shape contained in this GIS layer. The polygon intersects the zpts where we want to modify the elevations and remove the road embankment. We will remove the embankment at this location by creating a GIS layer that tells TUFLOW to interpolate zpt elevations within the shape using the zpt elevations either side of the embankment. Additionally, the GIS layer will be designed such that TUFLOW does not use the zpt elevations where the two shapes intersect with the embankment. Refer to Sectionthe 4<u>[https://docs.4tuflow.9 and Table 4.8 of the 2010com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ TUFLOW manualManual]</u> for more information on this procedure.
<li> Digitise four points snapped to each of the polygon nodes that are circled in the image below.</li>
'''''Tip:''''' It is helpful to make nodes along the polygon perimeter visible by customising the layer properties in layer control. Before digitising points, ensure snap mode is turned on by hitting the S key. <br>
Line 44:
|}
</li>
The attributes are described fullycompletely in Tablethe 4<u>[https://docs.21 of the 2010tuflow.com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ TUFLOW manualManual]</u>. Note that L1, L2, and L3 refer to varying layers, as described in Section 4.7.2.3. We are setting:
* Enter an "Invert" value of 99999 to leave the Zpt levels unchanged (ie. use the Zpt elevations modified by the 2d_zsh layer above).
* Percentage blockage below the obvert of layer 1 to account for any blockages perpendicular to the direction of flow (in this case 6% to account for the average blockage due to the bridge piers).
* A Form Loss Coefficient (FLC) below the obvert of layer 1 (in this case to account for sub-grid scale losses around piers). Note that the treatment of the FLC is different depending on the object used to define the flow constriction, i.e. a line or a polygon. The reason for this is to permit the flow constriction to be independent of the model cell size. See Table 4<u>[https://docs.19 in thetuflow.com/classic-hpc/manual/latest/ 2010TUFLOW Manual]</u> for more information. In this case, a polygon has been used and the FLC specified is the form loss ''per metre length'' in the predominant direction of flow. FLC values are dependent not on the flow width, but on the length of travel in the direction of flow. Our intention for this study, is to apply a total FLC of 0.3 below the obvert of the bridge. The value entered is therefore 0.3 / 15m which gives a value of 0.02. Refer to latter sections of this tutorial for guidance on how to check the applied FLC.
 
* Blockage from the obvert level to the top of layer 2 (in this case 100% to account for the bridge deck).