Revision as of 11:04, 20 December 2023 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,767 edits →What is the best approach for modelling buildings in rain on grid model? Tag: Visual edit ← Older edit		Revision as of 11:35, 20 December 2023 view source Chris Huxley (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 7,767 edits →What is the best approach for modelling buildings in rain on grid model? Tag: Visual edit Newer edit →
Line 41: == What is the best approach for modelling buildings in rain on grid model? == There are numerous different industry standard ways to represent buildings in a direct rainfall model. <u>[https://downloads.tuflow.com/_archive/Australian_Rainfall_Runoff_Project_15_Subproject_report_buildings_final.pdf Australian Rainfall and Runoff Guideline, Project 15 (Representation of buildings in 2D Numerical Flood Models)]</u> discusses some of the available options. Common TUFLOW modelling approaches are summarised below: # Using depth varying Manning's n, apply a low value (n = 0.02) at shallow depth (d < 0.03m) and a high value (n > 0.3) at significant depths (d > 0.1m) to the building footprint: #* This is a very common and easy to implement option. The low Manning's n aims to mimic the quick runoff response associated with drainage from the roof. The higher Manning's n aims to represent the losses associated with deeper floodwater impacting the side of the building.

Direct Rainfall (Rain on Grid) Modelling Guidance: Difference between revisions