TUFLOW CATCH Tutorial M02 Results QGIS: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 15:
<li> Notice that bufferStrip1 has no pathogen masses entering or being removed, as it has no paddocks near it.
<li> If the removed mass is divided by the cumulative mass, the resulting value represents either the removal constant (if a constant removal equation was used), or the average removal performance (if a table removal method was used). For example, in trench1, the removal performance for SED_CLAY is calculated by:
<pre>rem SED_CLAY [g] / cum SED_CLAY [g] = 118881124003.800900 / 297204310009.400800 = 0.400 </pre>
This value (0.4) matches the removal constant. This constant was specified in the mass removal properties for pollutant 'SED_CLAY' for intervention device 'trench1' in the .tcc.<br>
In contrast, bufferStrip1 uses a table removal method for SED_CLAY, resulting in:
<pre>rem SED_CLAY [g] / cum SED_CLAY [g] = 150520283391.800500 / 150620283590.800600 = 0.999 </pre>
This shows that bufferStrip1 removed significantly more clay than trench1. The graph below demonstrates this calculation for each pollutant across all the treatment devices: <br>
<br>
[[File: image as described aboveTC2_removal_performance_all_devices_01a. eg in onenotepng]]<br>
<br>
</ol>