Revision as of 14:39, 19 December 2014 view source Mitch3007 (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,585 edits →Review of Results ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:39, 19 December 2014 view source Mitch3007 (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,585 edits →Review of Varying DEM Results Newer edit →
Line 69: This does raise one issue indirectly of flood mapping in urban areas where the flood depths are very shallow, or if using direct rainfall modelling. In these instances, mapping of urban areas may specify that flooding must be of a minimum depth to be mapped. For example, where the flooding is less than say, 0.05m, it is not mapped. Peak flood depths and water levels were exported to ESRI ASCII grids, and the flood extent was created by contouring the grid into a single region. Flows are outputted in .csv format and directly loaded into Excel. Profiles were created using the post processing utility TUFLOW_to_GIS and outputted into a .csv file. ==Manning's 'n' Values==

FMA Challenge 1 (1D-2D linked): Difference between revisions