Revision as of 18:56, 11 April 2022 view source Ellis Symons (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 3,091 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:57, 11 April 2022 view source Ellis Symons (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 3,091 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 48: The tool will produce a "ready to run" model in TUFLOW most of the time. There may be situations where the user will be required to make small adjustments to the output to get the model to run. If you encounter a situation where this happens, feel free to contact [mailto:support@tuflow.com support@tuflow.com] and let us know what the issue was.<Br> A known conversion issue could occur if the tool is converting both MIF and SHP files into a single format (e.g. GPKG) as the projection of these files may be interpreted slightly differently by GDAL (even though they are the same). Users may therefore be required to manually ~~fix up~~update the projection of the affected files, or add the TUFLOW command "<tt>GIS Projeciton Check == WARNING</tt>" to the TCF. '''Be careful''' to ensure they are in fact the same projection before using this command.<Br> ===Python and the Soure Code===

Convert TUFLOW Model GIS Format: Difference between revisions