Revision as of 10:03, 25 January 2024 view source Abigail.lillo (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 539 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:22, 8 August 2024 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,366 edits →When should I use a combination of SGS and Quadtree? Newer edit →
Line 24: =When should I use a combination of SGS and Quadtree?= Based on the benchmarking so far there seems to be little reason not to use SGS with Quadtree. The combination of SGS and Quadtree is particularly powerful for large models that require higher resolution in the focus area as this allows much larger cells away from the focus area without affecting the results.<br> SGS was not made the default in the 2020-01 release because for some models, especially those with coarse cell sizes over highly variable terrain, substantially different results can be seen due to SGS picking up a lot more detail of the terrain within a 2D cell. Using Quadtree with SGS, and by using coarser cells, much better results and good results convergence can be achieved~~. It's highly likely that SGS will be made the default in a future release once there has been extensive industry benchmarking demonstrating using SGS to be consistently superior to not using it~~.<br> <br>

Quadtree and Sub-Grid Sampling FAQ: Difference between revisions