FMA Challenge 1 (1D-2D linked): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 54:
To test the effect of different resolutions, simulations were made using grid resolutions of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 40 ft (Noted that only the 10 and 15ft are presented in this example).
To run the model with varying cell sizes from a single TCF, the use of scenarios has been implemented. The scenario here either '10ft' or '15ft' can be entered in the batch file using the -s command. If the -s command is not used, the model will assume a default model scenario of 10ft as specified by the line
<br>
The cell size, 2D timestep and log output frequency are all set using the TUFLOW Read File Command as follows:
Line 64 ⟶ 62:
<br>
Within the *.trd file the variables 2D_CELL_SIZE, 2D_Timestep and LogInt are set as scenario dependent variables.
When the model is initialised these variable values are inserted within the tcf and tgc file using the << >> syntax.
Upon examination of the results, the flood extents varied by unexpected amounts between different resolutions. For example, the 10ft grid scenario (provided as part of the ftp download) produces a more extensive flood extent, even though the profile down the 1D channel is almost identical to the 15ft case. The extended flooding is the result of very shallow flow (less than 0.01ft deep) over large flat (horizontal) areas caused by the use of contours to create the DEM as discussed above. Due to the slightly coarser resolution the 15ft grid does not let water on to some of these flats, and they remain dry. Should an accurate DEM be made available for this Challenge, the flood extents are likely to be very different and much more consistent between different grid resolutions!
| |||