MapInfo Style Check Files: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 20:
==Example Mapping 1D _TSMB.mif Layer (To Diagnose Instability Locations)==
 
<ol>
1. <li>In MapInfo, import the _TSMB.mif layer (Mass Balance Output must have been set to ON (the default) and the file is written to the .ecf Output Folder).
2. <li>Go to Map > Create Thematic Map…, choose Varying Ranges and one of the point style options as in the dialogue below:
 
[[File:MI_thematic_map_05.jpg]]
3. <li>Click Next and select the _TSMB layer and the ME_Avg_Abs attribute. The Ignore Zeros or Blanks can be ticked (zero mass error is not we are looking for!). Click Next.
 
4. <li>Use the various options in the last dialogue to change the styles, ranges, etc. and click OK. It is worthwhile having your GIS specialist to explain all the different options for thematic mapping so as to fully utilise the power of this feature. FigureThe 14figure 1below illustrates an example of thematically mapping problematic 1D nodes in a large 1D/2D model during the process of reviewing and fine-tuning the model during its development. The larger the circleobject the greater the mass error at those locations. Note the units of the mass error values for this layer are presently in m3/s, not in percent.
3. Click Next and select the _TSMB layer and the ME_Avg_Abs attribute. The Ignore Zeros or Blanks can be ticked (zero mass error is not we are looking for!). Click Next.
[[File:MI_thematic_map_06.jpg]]
4. Use the various options in the last dialogue to change the styles, ranges, etc. and click OK. It is worthwhile having your GIS specialist to explain all the different options for thematic mapping so as to fully utilise the power of this feature. Figure 14 1 illustrates an example of thematically mapping problematic 1D nodes in a large 1D/2D model during the process of reviewing and fine-tuning the model during its development. The larger the circle the greater the mass error at those locations. Note the units of the mass error values for this layer are presently in m3/s, not in percent.
</ol>