TUFLOW Check Files: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
Chris Huxley (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 150:
| [[Check_Files_2d_to_2d_bc | _2d_to_2d_check.mif<br>_2d_to_2d_check_R.shp]]|| Displays the 2D cells used to link two 2D domains together via a 2d_bc type “2D” boundary. Similar to the [[Check_Files_1d_to_2d_bc|_1d_to_2d_check layer]], the cells connected to the same hidden 1D node are given the same colour when using the .mif/.mid format. Use the command <font color="blue"><tt>Reveal 1D Nodes</tt></font> <font color="red"><tt>==</tt></font> <tt>ON</tt> command in the .tcf to view the locations of the hidden 1D nodes.
|}
= Common Questions Answered (FAQ)=
== My cross sections have various Manning's ''n'', but only one value is reported in 1d_ta_tables_check.csv. Is it applied correctly? ==
When the Manning’s ''n'' values differ throughout the cross section (N flag is specified), these are used to proportionally adjust the width of the cross section to an effective width and calculate the whole cross section as it has only one Manning’s ''n''. In the processed hydraulic properties part of the 1d_ta_tables_check.csv, the width is different to the effective width and the header of the last column K (conveyance) only shows a single Manning’s ''n'' value. The .eof file and nwk_C_check file will report one Manning's ''n'' and n_nf_cd value, the one that was used for the calculation of the effective width - bed elevation Manning's ''n''.<br>
Note: When an N flag is specified in XZ cross section, the n_nf_cd value in 1d_nwk layer becomes a Manning's ''n'' multiplier. It is usually set to 1 and could be used for calibration purposes.<br>
<br>
<br>
| |||