Tutorial Module02 Archive: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 16:36, 20 February 2025 view source Emilie Nielsen (talk \| contribs) Administrators 6,125 edits →Troubleshooting ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 16:05, 18 April 2025 view source Pavlina Monhartova (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 5,368 edits No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 154: [[Unsnapped_SX_Error_Archive \|Error 2024 - Could not find a 1D node snapped to CN line]]<br> [[Unsnapped_SX_Error_Archive \|Error 2028 - Could not find a CN object or 1D node snapped to 2D SX object.]]<br> [[~~Only_TUFLOW_DOS_Window_Archive~~Only_TUFLOW_Console_Window_Archive \| Why does the TUFLOW ~~DOS~~Console Window open, though the TCF isn’t read and the simulation doesn’t execute?]]<br> = Advanced - HPC Solver (Optional) = Line 174: ==Results== Using the methods described in the <u>[[Tutorial_Module02_Archive#Review_the_Results \| Review the Results]]</u> section above: Check the simulation logs in the ~~DOS~~console window, .tlf and .hpc.tlf log files. What proportion of the compute effort was spent on the 0D (initialisation, input / output communication between CPU and GPU, etc.), 1D modelling (CPU) and the 2D modelling (GPU)? Example compute percentage output is highlight below from the ~~DOS~~console window. <br> [[File:Tute M02 HPC 001.png\|frame\|none]] * View the results in your preferred package. How do they compare to the TUFLOW Classic results?